<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brief Episode &#187; Words of Wonder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briefepisode.com/tag/words-of-wonder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briefepisode.com</link>
	<description>artistry &#38; online presence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bons Mots: Eviscerate</title>
		<link>http://briefepisode.com/2008/11/20/word-to-wonder-about-eviscerate/</link>
		<comments>http://briefepisode.com/2008/11/20/word-to-wonder-about-eviscerate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Words of Wonder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefepisode.com/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all the Proposition 8 petitions from the side of the angels for marriage equality, I noticed a word crop up again and again about what the proposition would do if allowed as an amendment:  eviscerate. Now, it appears, that the Fund people who put through the last version of the law but were only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbriefepisode.com%2F2008%2F11%2F20%2Fword-to-wonder-about-eviscerate%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbriefepisode.com%2F2008%2F11%2F20%2Fword-to-wonder-about-eviscerate%2F&amp;source=BriefEpisode&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<div id="attachment_864" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://briefepisode.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/shells.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-864" title="Eviscerated Shells" src="http://briefepisode.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/shells-300x285.jpg" alt="Eviscerated Shells" width="300" height="285" /></a><p class="first-child wp-caption-text"><span title="E" class="cap"><span>E</span></span>viscerated Shells</p></div>
<p>In all the Proposition 8 petitions from the side of the angels for marriage equality, I noticed a word crop up again and again about what the proposition would do if allowed as an amendment:  <em><strong>eviscerate</strong></em>.<span id="more-809"></span></p>
<p>Now, it appears, that the Fund people who put through the last version of the law but were only helpers for Propositon 8 (and thus not recognized for the court&#8217;s purposes for being parties in the lawsuits), are also using the word.</p>
<blockquote><p>So here it is, per Merrium Webster:</p>
<p><span class="verb_class"><em></em></span><span class="sense_break"><span class="sense_label start">1 a</span><span class="sense_content"><strong>:</strong> to take out the entrails of <strong>:</strong> <a class="lookup" href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disembowel">disembowel</a></span> <span class="sense_label">b</span><span class="sense_content"><strong>:</strong> to deprive of vital content or force</span><span class="sense_break"><span class="sense_label start">2</span><span class="sense_content"><strong>:</strong> to remove an organ from (a patient) or the contents of (an organ)</span><span class="verb_class"><em>intransitive verb</em></span><span class="sense_content"><strong>:</strong> to protrude through a surgical incision or suffer protrusion of a part through an incision</span></span></span></p>
<div class="run_on">— <span class="variant">evis·cer·a·tion</span> <a class="audio" href="javascript:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?evisce02.wav=evisceration')"><img title="          Listen to the pronunciation of evisceration" src="http://www.merriam-webster.com/images/audio.gif" alt="          Listen to the pronunciation of evisceration" /></a> <span class="pronchars"> \-<span class="unicode">?</span>vi-s?-<span class="unicode">?</span>r?-sh?n\ </span> <em>noun</em></div>
</blockquote>
<div class="run_on">Somehow, I&#8217;d prefer that Proposition 8 removes rights, or dismantles them or even deletes them.  Evisceration seems a bit bloody.</div>
<div class="run_on">This kind of word choice reminds me of my high school days in the <a href="http://www.google.com.mx/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amun.org%2F&amp;ei=o84lSdPIDpSq8ASEzOVe&amp;usg=AFQjCNECG5wCUeSH7UQIqQL5rJTGHJrP5Q&amp;sig2=iH8EoTYQYpL7evcnWomVeg" target="_self">Model United Nations Club</a>.  One year I went to a conference and kids playing the part of France had to speak on every topic.  They would preface every statement with &#8220;the peace loving nation of France&#8221; because, apparently, that&#8217;s what the diplomants from France would say.  When they didn&#8217;t like a resolution, again, following the real life patterns, they&#8217;d pronounce everything &#8220;repugnant&#8221; &#8212; even if they ended up abstaining from a vote.</div>
<div class="run_on">[Image by <span class="nickname"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/twinsparc/" target="_blank">twinsparc</a> via Flickr under a Creative Commons license.]</span></div>
 Like this post? Check out others at the archives at www.BriefEpisode.com]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://briefepisode.com/2008/11/20/word-to-wonder-about-eviscerate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

